Verified Voting Logo
Edit Your PreferencesContact VerifiedVoting.orgAbout VerifiedVoting.org
Verified Voting HomeJoin - Help us do this work!Donate - Help us do this work!Take Action Today!Endorse the resolution!
Printer Friendly Version

See information for:

The Verified Voting Foundation engages in educational activities permitted by IRC Section 501(c)(3). Please visit VerifiedVoting.org for info about 501(c)(4) lobbying activities. You can also visit Vote Trust USA, a project of the Verified Voting Foundation. Also, check out our blog and twitter feed.

E-Mail This Page

Home   »  News  »  County Not Friendly to Disabled ...


County Not Friendly to Disabled Voters

Only 4 out of 50 polling places are accessible

by Paul McKibbenhttp://www.chronicle-tribune.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20041226/NEWS01/412260313/1002
December 26th, 2004

Scott Peer has experienced first hand Grant County's lack of accessibility for voters.

That's not surprising, because only four of Grant County's 50 polling locations are accessible to voters with disabilities, a new study has found.

Peer, who is in a wheelchair, had to use another door to get inside his polling location, Allen Elementary School, 1115 E. Bradford St., on Nov. 2. Peer said the doors were not wide enough to get inside the polling location.

He called that an inconvenience.

Once inside to vote, Peer, 27, 622 E. Bond Ave., found that the voting machine was low enough for him to press the buttons to vote but was too high for him to read the ballot. His dad helped him read the names.

"To me, that wasn't very private," he said.

Grant County Clerk Carolyn Mowery said the polling locations must be accessible by Jan. 1, 2006, in time for that year's primary and general elections. There are no elections in Grant County next year.

"I'm kind of surprised," said Mowery, who oversees local elections. "I didn't think it would be that serious. I just didn't think it would be that many."

The Help America Vote Act of 2002, passed by Congress after the presidential election debacle in Florida four years ago, requires all polling locations to be accessible and mandates that polling places offer at least one voting machine that allow voters with disabilities to cast their ballots.

Count Us In, part of the Indiana Governor's Council for People with Disabilities, conducted the study Nov. 2, the last general election in Grant County.

County officials are taking steps to improve accessibility.

The county has $277,886, in a mix of state and federal funds, to purchase voting machines for voters with disabilities.

The machines are equipped with a device that features a voice activation capability for the visually impaired. Voters wear headphones while the machine reads the ballot's text to the voter. The machines also are portable and can be carried to a person in a wheelchair.

Mowery said those machines also will be used by voters who do not have disabilities. There will be at least one machine in every polling location.

The county currently doesn't have ballots in Braille, and Mowery has said visually impaired voters must have someone read them the ballot.

The study did find that the door openings at Peer's poll, Allen Elementary School, were not at least 32 inches wide and accessible parking spaces are not the closest to the building.

Julia Vaughn, project manager of Count Us In, said this county is typical.

For example, when Marion County's polling locations were reviewed in the Nov. 2003 municipal election, 96 percent were found not in compliance. Grant County's percentage is 92, just slightly better. Other counties were either studied Nov. 2 or at last May's primary election.

Vaughn said the state has only $375,000 from the federal government to improve accessibility.

"There's going to be a need for counties to come up with some creative solutions," she said.

The four polling locations that do not have any problems are Brookhaven Wesleyan Church, 2960 E. 38th St., Riverview Elementary School, 513 Buckingham Drive, Kendall Elementary School, 2009 W. Kem Road, and Northwood Manor, 1590 Timberview Drive.

It's not clear yet what measures the county will take to make the remaining 46 polling locations more accessible.

Solving the problem may include having additional precincts at a single polling location if the county can't afford the repairs, according to Mowery

"Some of them may be cheap to fix. Some of them may be costly," Mowery said.

In the past, Mowery said if a voters with disabilities called and did not want to go to their polling location to vote or if they thought it wasn't accessible, the voter would vote in the county's absentee voting office at the courthouse. But absentee voting does not happen on Election Day.

"We have to make sure the polling locations are accessible," Mowery said.

The Governor's Council has provided officials with a booklet of suggestions to make polling locations more accessible.

For example if the problem is that there is not any accessible handicap parking or enough spaces available, the council recommends that officials find a relatively level parking area near the accessible entrance and designate the area for accessible parking spaces and adjacent access aisles. Also, they can use three parking spaces to make two accessible parking spaces with an access aisle.

County officials also have formed an advisory council to help determine polling locations. 

Announcements

August 26, 2010
On India’s Electronic Voting Controversy
August 25, 2010
Pac-Man for president: Hack highlights e-voting flaws
August 6, 2010
Voting Technology Research Gets In-Depth
July 27, 2010
State Election Officials: Recountable Process A Must for Overseas Voters
July 20, 2010
Online Voting: All That Glitters Is Not Gold (Unless You're a Vendor)
June 21, 2010
Voting Without A Net In South Carolina
June 17, 2010
Voting results in New Jersey should not be mysterious
June 16, 2010
Verified Voting Calls for Recountable, Auditable Voting Systems Following South Carolina Primary
June 16, 2010
Voting integrity groups call for investigation of South Carolina voting systems in wake of unexpected primary results in Democratic US Senate race
June 15, 2010
On the South Carolina Primary
May 23, 2010
Benefits, risks of e-mail ballots weighed
May 4, 2010
PA - Team 4: Security Concerns About Voting Machines Remain
April 26, 2010
California Assembly committee endorses UC Berkeley statistician's election auditing method
March 8, 2010
Feds Move to Break Voting-Machine Monopoly
March 2, 2010
Is the Internet the Right Place for Our Ballots? Election Administration and Voting Rights Thought Leaders Weigh in on the Future of Overseas Voting at Summit 2010
February 25, 2010
Minnesota Civic Groups Refute Recount Claims
February 17, 2010
Groups and Election Officials Warn Department of Justice that Voting Machine Vendor Merger will Inflate Costs to Taxpayers, Threaten Election Accuracy and National Security
February 11, 2010
Fla. justices uphold local election law
February 3, 2010
NJ Judge Issues Mixed Order on Use of E-voting Machines
February 1, 2010
Ruling Issued in Rutgers–Newark Law School’s Constitutional Litigation Clinic Challenge to NJ's Electronic Voting Machines

Get E-Mail Alerts




Important Links

  • VVBlog: Check out the latest news and commentary at our blog.
  • Election Day Problems?
    Call 1-866-OUR-VOTE
  • Find Your Polling Place: Vote411.org
  • Questions? Contact Us
  • Vote Trust USA - national resource for state-based organizations supporting verifiable elections, a Verified Voting Foundation project


  • "The core of our American democracy is the right to vote. Implicit in that right is the notion that that vote be private, that vote be secure, and that vote be counted as it was intended when it was cast by the voter. And I think what we're encountering is a pivotal moment in our democracy where all of that is being called into question." (more here)

    Kevin Shelley, former
    California Sec. of State





    Verified Voting Foundation, Inc., is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit corporation.

    © Copyright 2008, Verified Voting Foundation, Inc. All rights reserved, although reprint permission granted for nonprofit purposes with attribution to Verified Voting Foundation, Inc.


    Privacy    Site Map