Verified Voting Logo
Edit Your PreferencesContact VerifiedVoting.orgAbout VerifiedVoting.org
Verified Voting HomeJoin - Help us do this work!Donate - Help us do this work!Take Action Today!Endorse the resolution!
Printer Friendly Version

See information for:

The Verified Voting Foundation engages in educational activities permitted by IRC Section 501(c)(3). Please visit VerifiedVoting.org for info about 501(c)(4) lobbying activities. You can also visit Vote Trust USA, a project of the Verified Voting Foundation. Also, check out our blog and twitter feed.

E-Mail This Page

Home   »  News  »  Opinion Summary This Week


Opinion Summary This Week

ElectionLine
November 18th, 2004

   * While there were no “massive problems” at the polls, the election showed the need for a “rational, consistent set of rules” for federal elections, the Denver Post asserts. Different state approaches to provisional voting will be remembered as particularly problematic, the editorial states. The Minneapolis Star-Tribune also urges Congress to do more, including pass a Really Help America Vote Act.    The Boston Globe expressed similar concerns.

   * The Journal-Sentinel has its own recommendations, including a ban on punch-card voting, mandatory election-day registration, paper trails for all voting, a block on any state law barring voting by ex-felons who have completed their sentences and parole and more poll workers and voting booths to reduce lines at the polls.

   * The Wisconsin State Journal takes the opposite approach, urging state lawmakers “not to overdo it” in the wake of this month’s presidential vote, which went well for the most part. 

   * Democrats are still working their way through the “stages of grief,” writes columnist Jeff Defede in  The Miami Herald. They seem stuck in denial, as evidenced by countless conspiracies circulating on the Internet. “There are teams of reporters and other interested parties, sifting through the allegations, trying to find evidence the election was stolen. So far, none has emerged. If it is out there, then I'm confident it will be revealed. (Registration required.)

   * Those who dismiss the allegations of electronic voting problems, phantom votes, secret counting in Ohio and backwards counting in Florida as the musings of conspiracy theorists are “missing the real point,” states an editorial in The New York Times. “Until our election system is improved - with better mechanics and greater transparency - we cannot expect voters to have full confidence in the announced results,” the editors write. (Registration required.)

   * “Electronic voting mostly succeeded,” states an editorial from the San Diego Union-Tribune reprinted in the Pasadena Star-News. E-voting “succeeded in its biggest test ever on Election Day as some 45 million voters cast their ballots on digital touch-screen machines, with early reports indicating only relatively minor problems.”

Other local opinion: 

Alabama
Colorado
Florida
Michigan
North Carolina
South Carolina

Announcements

August 26, 2010
On Indias Electronic Voting Controversy
August 25, 2010
Pac-Man for president: Hack highlights e-voting flaws
August 6, 2010
Voting Technology Research Gets In-Depth
July 27, 2010
State Election Officials: Recountable Process A Must for Overseas Voters
July 20, 2010
Online Voting: All That Glitters Is Not Gold (Unless You're a Vendor)
June 21, 2010
Voting Without A Net In South Carolina
June 17, 2010
Voting results in New Jersey should not be mysterious
June 16, 2010
Verified Voting Calls for Recountable, Auditable Voting Systems Following South Carolina Primary
June 16, 2010
Voting integrity groups call for investigation of South Carolina voting systems in wake of unexpected primary results in Democratic US Senate race
June 15, 2010
On the South Carolina Primary
May 23, 2010
Benefits, risks of e-mail ballots weighed
May 4, 2010
PA - Team 4: Security Concerns About Voting Machines Remain
April 26, 2010
California Assembly committee endorses UC Berkeley statistician's election auditing method
March 8, 2010
Feds Move to Break Voting-Machine Monopoly
March 2, 2010
Is the Internet the Right Place for Our Ballots? Election Administration and Voting Rights Thought Leaders Weigh in on the Future of Overseas Voting at Summit 2010
February 25, 2010
Minnesota Civic Groups Refute Recount Claims
February 17, 2010
Groups and Election Officials Warn Department of Justice that Voting Machine Vendor Merger will Inflate Costs to Taxpayers, Threaten Election Accuracy and National Security
February 11, 2010
Fla. justices uphold local election law
February 3, 2010
NJ Judge Issues Mixed Order on Use of E-voting Machines
February 1, 2010
Ruling Issued in RutgersNewark Law Schools Constitutional Litigation Clinic Challenge to NJ's Electronic Voting Machines

Get E-Mail Alerts




Important Links

  • VVBlog: Check out the latest news and commentary at our blog.
  • Election Day Problems?
    Call 1-866-OUR-VOTE
  • Find Your Polling Place: Vote411.org
  • Questions? Contact Us
  • Vote Trust USA - national resource for state-based organizations supporting verifiable elections, a Verified Voting Foundation project


  • "The core of our American democracy is the right to vote. Implicit in that right is the notion that that vote be private, that vote be secure, and that vote be counted as it was intended when it was cast by the voter. And I think what we're encountering is a pivotal moment in our democracy where all of that is being called into question." (more here)

    Kevin Shelley, former
    California Sec. of State





    Verified Voting Foundation, Inc., is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit corporation.

    © Copyright 2008, Verified Voting Foundation, Inc. All rights reserved, although reprint permission granted for nonprofit purposes with attribution to Verified Voting Foundation, Inc.


    Privacy    Site Map