Verified Voting Logo
Edit Your PreferencesContact VerifiedVoting.orgAbout VerifiedVoting.org
Verified Voting HomeJoin - Help us do this work!Donate - Help us do this work!Take Action Today!Endorse the resolution!
Printer Friendly Version

See information for:

The Verified Voting Foundation engages in educational activities permitted by IRC Section 501(c)(3). Please visit VerifiedVoting.org for info about 501(c)(4) lobbying activities. You can also visit Vote Trust USA, a project of the Verified Voting Foundation. Also, check out our blog and twitter feed.

E-Mail This Page

Home   »  News  »  E-Voting News  »  Ballot design causes over-voting ...


Ballot design causes over-voting problems

story here
June 15th, 2004

Ballot design causes over-voting problems

From Staff & Wire Reports

CHARLESTON - Ballot designs that split Democratic secretary of state candidates into two columns likely caused over-voting problems in several counties during last month's primary, Secretary of State Joe Manchin told a legislative interim committee meeting Sunday.
While all the ballots had the word ''continued'' at the foot of the first column, some had nothing at the top of the second column to denote that it was the continuation of the secretary of state balloting. Many voters inadvertently voted a second time in that column, nullifying their vote for the office, including more than 1,500 overvotes in Marion County alone, Manchin said.

Elections officers in in Wood County reported no problems with the secretary of state's race in the primary election.

Manchin, the Democratic nominee for governor, said his office will have ''a couple of recommendations'' for county clerks.

One recommendation will be to restate the name of the office at the top of the second column.

Manchin also said Sunday he plans to distribute $20 million in federal funds for electronic voting machines through a no-interest loan fund. Under the federal Help America Vote Act, West Virginia has to come up with a uniform voting system to replace paper and punch card ballots by 2006.

Manchin delayed implementation of statewide electronic voting last year after critics said the machines were not secure. Manchin has said he hopes advances in technology will allow him to put out a request for proposals for machines that can be used throughout West Virginia before he leaves office in January.

''We don't recommend spending $20 million or $30 million to upgrade the system unless we believe we have the system we need,'' Manchin said Sunday.

Currently, four counties use touch-screen machines for early voting, and Cabell County uses the machines for both early and Election Day voting. Marion County plans to use them for Election Day voting in November.

Announcements

August 26, 2010
On India’s Electronic Voting Controversy
August 25, 2010
Pac-Man for president: Hack highlights e-voting flaws
August 6, 2010
Voting Technology Research Gets In-Depth
July 27, 2010
State Election Officials: Recountable Process A Must for Overseas Voters
July 20, 2010
Online Voting: All That Glitters Is Not Gold (Unless You're a Vendor)
June 21, 2010
Voting Without A Net In South Carolina
June 17, 2010
Voting results in New Jersey should not be mysterious
June 16, 2010
Verified Voting Calls for Recountable, Auditable Voting Systems Following South Carolina Primary
June 16, 2010
Voting integrity groups call for investigation of South Carolina voting systems in wake of unexpected primary results in Democratic US Senate race
June 15, 2010
On the South Carolina Primary
May 23, 2010
Benefits, risks of e-mail ballots weighed
May 4, 2010
PA - Team 4: Security Concerns About Voting Machines Remain
April 26, 2010
California Assembly committee endorses UC Berkeley statistician's election auditing method
March 8, 2010
Feds Move to Break Voting-Machine Monopoly
March 2, 2010
Is the Internet the Right Place for Our Ballots? Election Administration and Voting Rights Thought Leaders Weigh in on the Future of Overseas Voting at Summit 2010
February 25, 2010
Minnesota Civic Groups Refute Recount Claims
February 17, 2010
Groups and Election Officials Warn Department of Justice that Voting Machine Vendor Merger will Inflate Costs to Taxpayers, Threaten Election Accuracy and National Security
February 11, 2010
Fla. justices uphold local election law
February 3, 2010
NJ Judge Issues Mixed Order on Use of E-voting Machines
February 1, 2010
Ruling Issued in Rutgers–Newark Law School’s Constitutional Litigation Clinic Challenge to NJ's Electronic Voting Machines

Get E-Mail Alerts




Important Links

  • VVBlog: Check out the latest news and commentary at our blog.
  • Election Day Problems?
    Call 1-866-OUR-VOTE
  • Find Your Polling Place: Vote411.org
  • Questions? Contact Us
  • Vote Trust USA - national resource for state-based organizations supporting verifiable elections, a Verified Voting Foundation project


  • "The core of our American democracy is the right to vote. Implicit in that right is the notion that that vote be private, that vote be secure, and that vote be counted as it was intended when it was cast by the voter. And I think what we're encountering is a pivotal moment in our democracy where all of that is being called into question." (more here)

    Kevin Shelley, former
    California Sec. of State





    Verified Voting Foundation, Inc., is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit corporation.

    © Copyright 2008, Verified Voting Foundation, Inc. All rights reserved, although reprint permission granted for nonprofit purposes with attribution to Verified Voting Foundation, Inc.


    Privacy    Site Map