Verified Voting Logo
Edit Your PreferencesContact VerifiedVoting.orgAbout VerifiedVoting.org
Verified Voting HomeJoin - Help us do this work!Donate - Help us do this work!Take Action Today!Endorse the resolution!
Printer Friendly Version

See information for:

The Verified Voting Foundation engages in educational activities permitted by IRC Section 501(c)(3). Please visit VerifiedVoting.org for info about 501(c)(4) lobbying activities. You can also visit Vote Trust USA, a project of the Verified Voting Foundation. Also, check out our blog and twitter feed.

E-Mail This Page

Home   »  News  »  E-Voting News  »  Election Commission Bails Out ...


Election Commission Bails Out Voting Machine Maker In Time for May Primary

story here
March 11th, 2004

Election Commission Bails Out Voting Machine Maker In Time for May Primary

By Karen Hensel and Loni Smith McKown
I-Team 8

What began as an I-Team 8 investigation into voting technology got hot late Wednesday night. On the grill: Election Systems and Software (ES&S), the maker of touch-screen voting machines used in Indiana and across the nation. 

Heated debate about voting machines ignited fireworks Wednesday.

”Am I so damn stupid…that for me to use the word "work," do you understand that to run an election for something to work, it's gotta count the votes?” asked an exasperated election commissioner S. Anthony Long to ES&S executive Ken Carbullido.

Indiana election commissioners were disgusted late Wednesday night with answers to questions about new touch-screen voting systems. “If we could fine you, I'd make the motion now,” said Long. Carbullido replied, “Sir, I stand behind the answer I gave you.” Long said, “It would work. But then you tell your clerks it won't work because it won't tabulate the votes. I don't believe this.”

The I-Team first told you about a conference call last week that panicked four county clerks. They were told the certified software in their new electronic voting machines might not tabulate the votes. We have since found a way to make it work and that's why I was able to answer to you correctly today and say it will work,” said Carbullido.

“When you say we gotta use it, you say we gotta dust it off and find out ways to make it work. Come on!” said Long.

“I just think I was absolutely lied to by your CEO and I'm more than on the slow burn about it.  I sat in this room and you all lied to me. You're so derelict in your duties that you can't look at a piece of paper and answer the question? Give me a break,” said Brian Burdick, who also serves on the election commission.

They had come all the way from Omaha with apologies. “We at ES&S made the mistake of loading the wrong version of firmware on their units,” said Rob McGinnis, ES&S.

A version of embedded computer code used by Johnson, Henry and Wayne Counties in November was actually illegal because it had not been approved by the state.

“We've changed our corporate policies and procedures to require thorough reporting of the status of certifications as well as any movement of product from warehouse to customer sites to the field,” said Carbullido.

Three of the panicked clerks wanted to re-use the illegal software they used in November. A fourth clerk with brand-new machines, Vandergurgh County's Marsha Abell, was ready to throw in the towel and return her federal reimbursement money to the state. “I have my check in my folder and I'm willing to give it back to the state and use my punchcards,” she said.

“Bailing you guys out is just beyond distasteful for me,” said Burdick.

The state did bail them out. With reservations, the commission approved use of the illegal software for the May primary. “I don't want any county or the state to be out any more time or effort because of the condition ES&S has put everybody in and I think this is time to put up or shut up,” said Long.

The solution is temporary. The deadline for ES&S to certify software is October first. If the deadline isn't met, the four counties will have one short month to figure out how residents will vote this fall for governor and for president. “I just want to say, I feel sorry for you guys,” said Burdick.
 
A losing candidate could challenge an election conducted on uncertified equipment. ES&S will put up a $10 million performance bond against any legal expenses or problems that arise. ES&S is still racing the clock to certify new software before the fall election.

Announcements

August 26, 2010
On India’s Electronic Voting Controversy
August 25, 2010
Pac-Man for president: Hack highlights e-voting flaws
August 6, 2010
Voting Technology Research Gets In-Depth
July 27, 2010
State Election Officials: Recountable Process A Must for Overseas Voters
July 20, 2010
Online Voting: All That Glitters Is Not Gold (Unless You're a Vendor)
June 21, 2010
Voting Without A Net In South Carolina
June 17, 2010
Voting results in New Jersey should not be mysterious
June 16, 2010
Verified Voting Calls for Recountable, Auditable Voting Systems Following South Carolina Primary
June 16, 2010
Voting integrity groups call for investigation of South Carolina voting systems in wake of unexpected primary results in Democratic US Senate race
June 15, 2010
On the South Carolina Primary
May 23, 2010
Benefits, risks of e-mail ballots weighed
May 4, 2010
PA - Team 4: Security Concerns About Voting Machines Remain
April 26, 2010
California Assembly committee endorses UC Berkeley statistician's election auditing method
March 8, 2010
Feds Move to Break Voting-Machine Monopoly
March 2, 2010
Is the Internet the Right Place for Our Ballots? Election Administration and Voting Rights Thought Leaders Weigh in on the Future of Overseas Voting at Summit 2010
February 25, 2010
Minnesota Civic Groups Refute Recount Claims
February 17, 2010
Groups and Election Officials Warn Department of Justice that Voting Machine Vendor Merger will Inflate Costs to Taxpayers, Threaten Election Accuracy and National Security
February 11, 2010
Fla. justices uphold local election law
February 3, 2010
NJ Judge Issues Mixed Order on Use of E-voting Machines
February 1, 2010
Ruling Issued in Rutgers–Newark Law School’s Constitutional Litigation Clinic Challenge to NJ's Electronic Voting Machines

Get E-Mail Alerts




Important Links

  • VVBlog: Check out the latest news and commentary at our blog.
  • Election Day Problems?
    Call 1-866-OUR-VOTE
  • Find Your Polling Place: Vote411.org
  • Questions? Contact Us
  • Vote Trust USA - national resource for state-based organizations supporting verifiable elections, a Verified Voting Foundation project


  • "The core of our American democracy is the right to vote. Implicit in that right is the notion that that vote be private, that vote be secure, and that vote be counted as it was intended when it was cast by the voter. And I think what we're encountering is a pivotal moment in our democracy where all of that is being called into question." (more here)

    Kevin Shelley, former
    California Sec. of State





    Verified Voting Foundation, Inc., is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit corporation.

    © Copyright 2008, Verified Voting Foundation, Inc. All rights reserved, although reprint permission granted for nonprofit purposes with attribution to Verified Voting Foundation, Inc.


    Privacy    Site Map